Home

Radio

Sports

Columnists

Word on the Street

Archives

Newsletter

About

Contact

| Share it

 

Digg it

 

Send it

 

THE WEEKLY WIPE

Subscribe to The Weekly Wipe e-newsletter

Your Email:


 

 

Add to My Yahoo!

   

ADVERTISEMENT


 

 

Professional football crowns champion through elaborate system of post-season games

 

Send this story to a friend

February 4, 2009 | Issue 6-4

 

TAMPA, Fla. – The NFL crowned the Pittsburgh Steelers 2009 champions by using a system of head-to-head competitions, pitting the league’s most winning teams against one another in a single-elimination tournament.

 

The NFL’s current “playoff” system, culminating with the Super Bowl, was formed 1977 in order to crown a definitive champion. It relies on a multi-team contest in which teams are eliminated after losing to determine which teams play in the Super Bowl.

 

Many remain critical of the system, which fails to allow a combination of polls and computer rankings to decide the teams most deserving of spots in the Super Bowl.

 

“Are you telling me that if we had a computer system Arizona would have been in the championship game?” asked sports pundit Jay Mariotti, who has long been a proponent of an arithmetical system for the NFL. “By using a mathematical formula to decide the championship game teams, you capture the very essence of competition and ensure a fair result.

 

The number of rounds has been tweaked over the years, but the changes have done little to quell discontent. This year, 13-win Tennessee and the 12-win New York Giants, who beat Arizona during the regular season, both complained after they were left out of the title game.

 

“I mean, I understand we did everything we could do,” said Giants quarterback Eli Manning, who believed that his team deserved a shot at the title despite losing its last game. “At some point it was just out of our hands. Does it make sense that Arizona got in [to the Super Bowl] and we didn’t? I guess that’s not for me to decide.”

 

A system that allows a 9-7 Arizona team to play in the title game over teams with three and four more wins has given critics a stronger voice in an argument that has been raging since the playoffs were introduced more than 30 years ago.

 

“Allowing something as important as who plays for the championship to be left up to competitive skill and chance is ludicrous,” said Tennessee coach Jeff Fisher. “I’m tired of seeing my teams work so hard all year to have a flawed procedure take away their shot at a championship. What the NFL needs is at least a partial computer-aided system of determining who the best teams are.”

 

Experts say a system dependent on computer rankings and polls is unlikely despite support from high-ranking officials. Even former Detroit Lions President Matt Millen, who in 2005 lobbied Congress to gain more playoff access for teams like his, doesn't expect change to come to the NFL.

 

"Even though there is a cry for a computer-based system, I think it's unlikely we will see it in any reasonable period of time," he said.  

Send this story to a friend


 

          Add to My Yahoo!

 


 

 

Home  |  Help  |  Contact  |  About  |  Subscribe